<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://tumblr.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/><description></description><title>Joe Kloc</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @joekloc)</generator><link>http://joekloc.com/</link><item><title>World Science Festival Playing Cards Illustrations</title><description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://worldsciencefestival.com/events/biodiversity_game"&gt;World Science Festival&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ILLUSTRATIONS FOR A DECK OF CARDS DESIGNED AND PRINTED BY THE WORLD SCIENCE FESTIVAL TO EDUCATE CHILDREN ABOUT BIODIVERSITY.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4t5wc1Sya1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Spiny Head Blenny - gouache, pen and ink&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4t5zhzYj11qa4e71.tiff"/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Spiny Lobster - gouache, pen and ink&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4t63lCqzN1qa4e71.tiff"/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bigfin Reed Squid - gouache, pen and ink&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://worldsciencefestival.com/events/biodiversity_game"&gt;Read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/24027532714</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/24027532714</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 19:48:00 -0400</pubDate><category>illustration</category></item><item><title>Illustration for Rate My Study Abroad website</title><description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://Ratemystudyabroad.com"&gt;Rate My Study Abroad&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4t5n0sWTf1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/24026814785</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/24026814785</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>illustration</category></item><item><title>The Case of the Missing Moon Rocks</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://atavist.net/the-case-of-the-missing-moon-rocks/"&gt;The Atavist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JOSEPH GUTHEINZ IS ON A MISSION TO SAVE THE MOON. DECADES AGO, ASTRONAUTS BROUGHT BACK 850 POUNDS OF ROCKS FROM THEIR LUNAR JOURNEYS; THE U.S. GAVE SOME AWAY AS &amp;#8220;GOODWILL&amp;#8221; GIFTS TO THE WORLD&amp;#8217;S NATIONS. OVER TIME, MANY OF THEM DISAPPEARED, STOLEN OR LOST ON THE BLACK MARKET. GUTHEINZ, FIRST AS A NASA INVESTIGATOR AND THEN THE LEADER OF A RAGTAG GROUP OF STUDENTS, HAS DEDICATED HIS LIFE TO GETTING THEM BACK. AUTHOR JOE KLOC TELLS A WILD STORY OF GEOPOLITICS, CRIME, SCIENCE, AND ONE MAN&amp;#8217;S OBSESSION TO KEEP THE MOON OUT OF THE WRONG HANDS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4t4vyi8EK1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://atavist.net/the-case-of-the-missing-moon-rocks/"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/18091810704</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/18091810704</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:28:00 -0500</pubDate><category>Illustration</category><category>article</category></item><item><title>California's Inshore Fishes</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I ILLUSTRATED SOME OF CALIFORNIA&amp;#8217;S INSHORE FISHES. IF I&amp;#8217;VE COLORED ANY OF THEM ACCURATELY, IT WAS A COMPLETE ACCIDENT. THE QUOTED TEXT IN THE CAPTIONS COMES FROM &lt;em&gt;INSHORE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA&lt;/em&gt;, A BOOKLET VERY APPARENTLY PUBLISHED FIVE DECADES AGO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltstt2EH6K1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Grass Rockfish (Sebastodes rastrelliger). &amp;#8220;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;The grass rockfish is the most important of the rockfishes to rocky shore and jetty fishermen. When caught from the shore this cagey scrapper will use every trick in the book. He will sulk in cracks, crevices and caves or will tangle himself in seaweed, making his conquest difficult but rewarding if successful. Stripbaits, mussels, clams or shrimp will all entice this fellow to bite.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltsttmM5CR1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Barred Surfperch (Amphistichus argenteus). &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;#8220;Almost nothing is known about the red tail and calico surfperch. There is especial need for information about large-sized ones&amp;#8230; Surfperch fishing is good the year around; however old timers will tell you that December and January are consistently the best.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;!-- more --&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltstudBD6x1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Opaleye (Girella nigricans). &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;#8220;One of the most important fish in the rocky shore fisherman&amp;#8217;s bag, in recent years opaleye have more or less come into the limelight&amp;#8230; Opaleye are considered a good fish by many. Too many anglers discard them without giving them a good try.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltstuwzsgi1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;California Corbina (Menticirrhus undulates)&lt;/strong&gt;. &amp;#8220;They are very particular feeders, apparently spitting out bits of clamshells and other foreign matter. About 90% of the food they eat is sand crabs. Clams and other crustaceans are of lesser importance.&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/12047530750</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/12047530750</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:26:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Illustration</category></item><item><title>Post-it Notes from the Underground </title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://therumpus.net/2011/10/post-it-notes-from-the-underground/"&gt;The Rumpus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JOE KLOC VISITED BOTH OCCUPY OAKLAND AND OCCUPY SAN FRANCISCO. THE FOLLOWING IS A &amp;#8220;POST-IT NOTE RECORD&amp;#8221; (MADE UP OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND OVERHEARD QUOTES) THAT KLOC CREATED BASED ON SCENES HE WITNESSED.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;#1: Published 10/26/11&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltq02shReE1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oakland, California - 10/16/11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltq045KPV41qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco, California - 10/16/11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;&lt;a href="http://therumpus.net/2011/10/post-it-notes-from-the-underground/"&gt;See More from &amp;#8220;Post-It Notes from the Underground #1&amp;#8221;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;#2: Published 10/31/11&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lty2m8ilwS1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oakland, California - 10/26/11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lty2ncWEW51qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oakland, California - 10/26/11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://therumpus.net/2011/10/post-it-notes-from-the-underground-2/"&gt;See More from &amp;#8220;Post-It Notes from the Underground #2&amp;#8221;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;#3: Published 10/31/11&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lu038s2w4S1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco, California - 10/26/11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lu03m9ZFor1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco, California - 10/26/11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://therumpus.net/2011/11/post-it-notes-from-the-underground-3/"&gt;See More from &amp;#8220;Post-It Notes from the Underground #3&amp;#8221;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/11986967079</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/11986967079</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:36:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Illustration</category></item><item><title>Illustrations for "Reading Between the Genes"</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://sciencereview.dreamhosters.com/read/spring-2011/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Berkeley Science Review&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ILLUSTRATIONS FOR &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/azeenghorayshi"&gt;AZEEN GHORAYSHI&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8217;S &lt;em&gt;BERKELEY SCIENCE REVIEW &lt;/em&gt;COVER STORY ON SCIENTISTS&amp;#8217; EFFORTS TO MAP THE DARK GENOME. (CAPTIONS BY AZEEN GHORAYSHI)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll5rjmf4Sy1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;To fit inside each individual cell, DNA must be condensed and packaged into fibers called chromatin. The double-stranded helical DNA first wraps around clusters of proteins called histones. The histones are arranged along the DNA like beads on a string, allowing the histone-DNA spool to coil, fold, and loop around themselves. The final product is the tightly packed fiber of chromatin, organized into distinct sets of chromosomes. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll5rm3TgA61qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Histone modifications are one of many cellular mechanisms that work to control gene expression. Processing long amino acid tails (yellow), histones can be &amp;#8220;tagged&amp;#8221; with chemical modifications (red). These tags are then recognized by other cellular machinery that can work to silence or activate the DNA in that region. Histone modifications are a type of epigenetic mechanism, meaning they are heritable but not encoded directly in the genome.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- more --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll5ygq0lWB1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drosophilia melanogaster.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll5yh1s8yT1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Caenorhabditis elegans.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll5roaItcQ1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In alternative splicing, a single gene can be read in multiple ways to produce different proteins. After transcription occurs (step 1), distinct segments of the RNA called introns (gray) are removed by cuts made on both sides at locations called splice junctions. The remaining RNA (colored) can then be reconnected to form different strands of mRNA (step 2). The different mRNAs will then serve as templates for the synthesis of different proteins (step 3).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll5rovfIQI1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/5463872969</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/5463872969</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 20:03:00 -0400</pubDate><category>illustration</category></item><item><title>Fascinated by Fear</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fascinated-by-fear"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scientific American Mind&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RESEARCHERS GET A RARE GLIMPSE AT LIFE WITHOUT FRIGHT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the few exceptions to the old saying “everybody is afraid of something” is a 44-year-old woman known to psychologists as patient SM. She suffers from a rare case of brain damage to an almond-shaped region of her brain called the amygdala that, according to a paper published online December 16 in Current Biology, makes her incapable of experiencing fear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fascinated-by-fear"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/4612183310</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/4612183310</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:15:00 -0400</pubDate><category>article</category></item><item><title>The Mystery of Stack-O-Lee</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://motherjones.com/mixed-media/2011/04/stack-o-lee-stagolee-blues-murder-ballads"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mother Jones&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MORE THAN 400 ARTISTS HAVE RECORDED VERSIONS OF THE NOTORIOUS MURDER BALLAD&amp;#8212;IF INDEED IT IS ONE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Christmas Day, 1895, a local pimp named &amp;#8220;Stack&amp;#8221; Lee Shelton walked into a St. Louis bar wearing pointed shoes, a box-back coat, and his soon-to-be infamous milk-white John B. Stetson hat. Stack joined his friend Billy Lyons for a drink. Their conversation settled on politics, and soon it grew hostile: Lyons was a levee hand and, like his brother-in-law—one of the richest black men in St. Louis at the time—a supporter of the Republican party. Stack had aligned himself with the local black Democrats. The details of their argument aren&amp;#8217;t known, but at some point Lyons snatched the Stetson off Stack&amp;#8217;s head. Stack demanded it back, and when Lyons refused, shot him dead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The story of Stack-O-Lee—or Stack O&amp;#8217;Lee or Stagger Lee or Stack A Lee depending on who&amp;#8217;s singing—became the popular subject of murder ballads and blues songs in the early 20th century. In the liner notes of a new collection, &lt;em&gt;People Take Warning: Murder Ballads and Disaster Songs, 1913-1938&lt;/em&gt;, Tom Waits argues that most murder ballads are &amp;#8220;just a cut above graffiti&amp;#8230;the oral tabloids of the day.&amp;#8221; They were written by street singers to capitalize on the pulp appeal of violent local crimes. Certainly the ballad of Stack-O-Lee seems to have begun this way. But unlike most ballads of its time, Stack-O-Lee&amp;#8217;s has survived and flourished through the years. What accounts for the story&amp;#8217;s longevity?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;&lt;a href="http://motherjones.com/mixed-media/2011/04/stack-o-lee-stagolee-blues-murder-ballads"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/4361639617</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/4361639617</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 04:17:00 -0400</pubDate><category>article</category></item><item><title>Japanese Nuclear Reactor Systems Drawn Like a NYC Subway Map</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://motherjones.com/blue-marble/2011/03/japan-reactor-diagram"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mother Jones&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;YOUR ONE-STOP DIAGRAM FOR UNDERSTANDING HOW THE FUKUSHIMA REACTORS WORK&amp;#8212;AND WHY THEY BROKE DOWN.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Workers in Japan are still pouring seawater on overheating nuclear reactor rods at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in an effort to decrease the risk of further meltdowns. (Read &lt;em&gt;Mother Jones&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8217; detailed and regularly updated &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://motherjones.com/blue-marble/2011/03/japans-nuclear-emergency"&gt;explainer on the current situation&lt;/a&gt;.) Here&amp;#8217;s what they&amp;#8217;re up against, as Kate Sheppard and Josh Harkinson explained shortly after the emergency began:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are six boiling-water reactors on the site, though only three were in operation at the time of the earthquake. These systems, designed by General Electric, rely on an influx of water to cool the reactor core. But the water systems require electricity that was cut off by the earthquake. It also appears that something—the initial quake, the tsunami, or aftershocks—knocked the site&amp;#8217;s back-up generators offline. Without the cooling system bringing in water, the core of a reactor will start to overheat—which in turn heats up the water already in the system and causes more of it to turn to steam. Emergency responders have been forced to vent some of the steam, releasing radiation, in order to prevent the containment domes from exploding. They are in a race against the clock to bring in new water supplies before the reacting nuclear fuel heats up beyond control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I couldn&amp;#8217;t find a schematic that showed the Fukushima reactors&amp;#8217; failed cooling systems in relation to their various other workings, I set out to remedy the problem in a visually accessible way. Think of the schematic diagram below like a &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.rochestersubway.com/images/photos/nyc_subway_map.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.rochestersubway.com/topics/2009/11/boy_lived_in_nyc_subway_for_11_days/&amp;amp;h=1247&amp;amp;w=963&amp;amp;sz=388&amp;amp;tbnid=Hg5wlNVfz211qM:&amp;amp;tbnh=150&amp;amp;tbnw=116&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3DNYC%2BSubway&amp;amp;zoom=1&amp;amp;q=NYC+Subway&amp;amp;usg=__7mFLzdqXKHaGCGyJAjxfW4CqM-M=&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=du2DTdfaHIbSsAOtptmHAg&amp;amp;ved=0CGAQ9QEwCA"&gt;New York City subway map&lt;/a&gt;. It shows the various components, connections, and relationships between the emergency water systems inside the Fukushima&amp;#8217;s five GE Mark I reactors. (A sixth reactor is a similar, though slightly newer, design.) It is based on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission&amp;#8217;s &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/03.pdf"&gt;Boiling Water Reactor Systems Manual&lt;/a&gt;, which contains drawings of the various Mark I emergency systems. In places where the manual was unclear, I consulted Japanese &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBzLIJsUMww"&gt;news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.netsi.dk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/image_thumb1.png"&gt;broadcasts&lt;/a&gt;. The drawings are not to scale and the layout of the pipes entirely my own (their location in relation to the various containment walls is based on the NRC manual).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lil4lkONxH1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mark I Reactor Components: &lt;/strong&gt;(A) Uranium fuel rods; (B) Steam separator and dryer assemblies (C) Graphite control rods; (D) Vent and head spray; (E) Reactor vessel; (F) Feedwater inlet; (G) Low pressure coolant injection inlet; (H) Steam outlet; (I) Core spray inlet; (J) Jet pump; (K) Recirculation pump; (L) Concrete shell &amp;#8220;drywell&amp;#8221;; (M) Venting system; (N) Suppression pool; (O) Boron tank; (P) Condensate storage tank; (Q) High pressure coolant injection system; (R) HCIS turbine; (S) Automatic depressurization system; (T) Main turbine; (U) Connection to generator; (V) Condenser; (W) Circulating water; (X) Connection to outside service water; (Y) Concrete shield plug; (Z) Control rod drives. Illustrations by Joe Kloc.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;&lt;a href="http://motherjones.com/blue-marble/2011/03/japan-reactor-diagram"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/4048819768</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/4048819768</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:55:00 -0400</pubDate><category>illustration</category><category>article</category></item><item><title>The Illustrated Guide to Epigenetics</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://motherjones.com/environment/2011/02/illustrated-guide-epigenetics/"&gt;Mother Jones&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HOW DO HUNDREDS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF CELLS ALL DEVELOP FROM THE SAME GENOME? THIS IS THE QUESTION DRIVING THE EMERGING SCIENCE OF EPIGENETICS. HERE&amp;#8217;S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What is epigenetics? &lt;/strong&gt;Human life begins as a single cell equipped with all of the genetic information—known as the genome—it will need to develop into a full-grown adult. Through a process of repeated cell division, this cell eventually multiplies into tens of trillions of cells, each containing a complete copy of the genome. Despite having identical genetic information, these trillions of cells somehow develop into hundreds of different cell types—from brain to liver cells—that make up the human body (&lt;strong&gt;FIGURE 1&lt;/strong&gt;). Figuring out how one genome can produce so many different types of cells is, in a nutshell, the project of a subfield of genetics known as epigentics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lil4tse2uE1qa4e71.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nucleosome:&lt;/strong&gt; DNA coils around proteins called histones, forming a nucleosome. (Note: This is a simplified drawing. In reality DNA wraps twice around a core group of eight histones.)Illustrations by Joe Kloc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="inline inline-left"&gt;&lt;span class="caption"&gt;&lt;a href="http://motherjones.com/environment/2011/02/illustrated-guide-epigenetics"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/3183288241</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/3183288241</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:01:00 -0500</pubDate><category>illustration</category><category>article</category></item><item><title>Yellow, Black, and Blues</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/yellow_black_and_blues/"&gt;Seed magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A LOOK AT OUR AGRICULTURAL PAST MAY EXPLAIN WHY HONEY BEES AROUND THE WORLD BEGAN DISAPPEARING THREE YEARS AGO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Consider the story&lt;/strong&gt; of the 1951 Muddy Waters song “Honey Bee”: When Waters arrived in Chicago in 1943 he found no audience for what he called the “sad old-time blues” that he’d learned growing up in Mississippi, listening to delta greats like Son House and Robert Johnson. So he spent the next couple years working full-time factory jobs as he tried to find a place for his woeful southern songs in the hot Chicago music scene alive with dancing pianos and swing jazz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then in 1945 Waters’ uncle gave him an electric guitar. It was this event that music historian Ted Gioia later called “a major step forward in the history of Chicago Blues, a harbinger of the electrified sound of that music.” Waters crafted his songs to fit the new instrument’s piercing volume and confidence. At the age of 33 he had his first hit, and soon after found himself in a recording studio for Chess records, solidifying his increasingly singular sound as he laid down three soon-to-be top-10 hits on the Billboard R&amp;amp;B Chart.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Sail on, sail on my little honey bee, sail on…” he cried, with all the joy of a man who had struggled for more than a decade, unappreciated, before finally succeeding in creating something truly original. “Honey Bee” was an electrified version of a song he had written years back on a cotton plantation in Mississippi. In some ways, it was just another blues song: the bee, with its long stinger and its sweet honey, had long been a staple of sexual imagery in the blues (“I got a bumble bee… he got all the stinger I need,” sang Memphis Minnie in 1929). But Waters had recast the honey bee from a sexual symbol to an ideal of dependable love, made bitter by worry: In lyrics strung out by the blue notes of the guitar, he wonders if despite his lovers constancy, she may never return. “…I don’t mind you sailing,” he howled, “but please don’t sail so long.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/yellow_black_and_blues/"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!--
&lt;p&gt;Muddy Waters had made the honey bee &amp;ldquo;synonymous with the pains and frustrations associated with love and intimacy,&amp;rdquo; writes Tammy Horn in&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Bees in America: How the Honey Bee Shaped a Nation&lt;/i&gt;. And the entertainment industry was only the most visible force in shaping the honey bee as the societal metaphor of the day. By the 1950s,&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Apis mellifera&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;was also being used to describe, &amp;ldquo;difficult power struggles between races, between spouses, between political parties, between generations, between legal rulings.&amp;rdquo; A decade ago, it might have seemed unlikely that there would be any real connection between the story of Waters&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;Honey Bee&amp;rdquo; and that of the European honey bee in North America. But since 2006, when bees began disappearing in record numbers as the result of a mysterious ailment known as Colony Collapse Disorder, scientific investigations into the honey bee&amp;rsquo;s history have revealed that, just as the honey bee was coming to symbolize Chicago&amp;rsquo;s struggling labor class, it was itself weakening under the modern industrial agriculture system it was tasked with maintaining. The story of the honey bee&amp;mdash;like that of &amp;ldquo;Honey Bee&amp;rdquo;&amp;mdash;is, at bottom, the story of modernization. And stopping the bees&amp;rsquo; disappearance is ultimately a question of understanding this story. What&amp;rsquo;s left to ask, after three years of research, is why has that been so hard to do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Only a superficial account&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;of the honey bee disappearance, the events that began to unfold in the fall of 2006, can be told with certainty: On November 12 a beekeeper named Dave Hackenberg went to check on his honey bees feasting on a Floridian field of Brazilian peppers. Hackenberg lived in Pennsylvania, but as a migratory beekeeper he had spent the past 40 years trucking his hives around the country to pollinate crops in places as far away as California. Alarm set in that day in Florida when he noticed that very few bees from his 400 colonies were buzzing around. He approached one of the hive boxes and lifted off the top. As is the case with almost all commercial beehives, each box contained a series of removable wooden frames inside which the bees had built their honeycomb. One-by-one Hackenberg pulled the frames from the box and examined the comb, only to discover that most of the bees were gone. He ran from hive to hive and almost every time found the same thing. All but 32 of his colonies had been lost.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shortly after, other East Coast-based migratory operations waiting out the winter on farms in California, Oklahoma, and Texas began reporting similar colony losses, sometimes as high as 90 to 100 percent. By late February 2007, non-migratory commercial operations were reporting losses in the Mid-Atlantic and Pacific Northwest. The honey bees, responsible for pollinating about 23 percent of US crops, were disappearing. All told, estimates indicate that between 615,000 and 875,000 of the nation's 2.4 million honey bee colonies were lost that winter. Some losses are expected each year, understood to be the result of mites and other factors. But in 2006, these losses had increased dramatically, and the cause of 25 percent of them could not be identified.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unknown culprit was originally dubbed &amp;ldquo;Fall-Dwindle Disease.&amp;rdquo; Soon after, however, it was renamed &amp;ldquo;Colony Collapse Disorder.&amp;rdquo; This revision itself suggests the peculiarities that began to plague investigations of the phenomenon. First, the die off did not end in the fall. It kept going through the warmer months, year-after-year, up to today. And the bees did not &amp;ldquo;dwindle,&amp;rdquo; as might be expected from a usual sickness. When Hackenberg examined his hives, only the brood&amp;mdash;the developing eggs, larvae, and pupae&amp;mdash;along with the queen and a handful of nursing bees had survived. A few of the dead workers were found in or around the hive, but the majority seemed simply to have disappeared. Whatever was happening, &amp;ldquo;disorder&amp;rdquo; was increasingly the word to describe it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Back in 2006 and 2007, we had three major hypotheses,&amp;rdquo; says Diana Cox-Foster, an entomologist at Pennsylvania State University. &amp;ldquo;The first was that new or emerging pathogens were underlying the loss of colonies, the second was that environmental toxins could be involved, and the third was that a combination of stressors&amp;mdash;like the lack of proper nutrition&amp;mdash;was to blame.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus far, scientists have identified 18 different viruses troubling the honey bees, many of them lethal. But the problem is that if you pick any one of these viruses, eventually you can find a case of Colony Collapse Disorder where that particular pathogen wasn&amp;rsquo;t involved. And controlled tests looking at how viruses affect colonies in greenhouses have revealed that even the most likely candidates simply don&amp;rsquo;t kill bees in the same way CCD does. Similarly, investigations into pesticides as a culprit found that chemicals toxic to bees were indeed present in pollen samples&amp;mdash;only, they were usually in non-lethal doses. And in Europe, where many of these chemicals were no longer in use, cases of CCD were also being widely reported. These toxins were certainly capable of affecting the bee&amp;rsquo;s behavior, but a pesticide, it seemed, did not a killer make. As for stressors, it has been no secret that our current practice of migratory beekeeping taxes the bee&amp;rsquo;s health. But the danger of shipping them across the country and feeding them from vats of fructose syrup&amp;mdash;a monosaccharide bees never evolved to consume as a liquid&amp;mdash;had existed long before the onset of CCD in 2006.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By June 2009 a report issued by the USDA had accepted&amp;mdash;not without a hint of resignation&amp;mdash;that &amp;ldquo;it now seems clear that no single factor alone is responsible for the malady.&amp;rdquo; Stopping honey bee colonies from collapsing wouldn&amp;rsquo;t be as easy as banning a pesticide or killing a new pathogen. Instead it appeared an interaction of different factors must underpin CCD&amp;mdash;for instance, a pesticide might have weakened the bees&amp;rsquo; immune systems enough so that a new virus proved lethal. And indeed, in 2009, a study at the French National Institute for Agricultural Research for the first time confirmed that pathogens and pesticides in combination could have synergistic negative effects on bees. &amp;ldquo;Scientists were suspicious that the parasite&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Nosema&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;was playing a role in CCD but what that role was remained unclear,&amp;rdquo; says C&amp;eacute;dric Alaux who worked on the study.&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Nosema&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;had been found in a lot of bee colonies suffering from CCD, but when tested in controlled experiments the parasite didn&amp;rsquo;t seem particularly lethal. It was when Alaux&amp;rsquo;s group exposed honey bees to non-lethal doses of a pesticide in addition to&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Nosema&lt;/i&gt;, that the combination proved deadly. &amp;ldquo;There was a kind of synergy between the pathogen and the pesticides,&amp;rdquo; says Alaux.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that, it became all but certain that getting to the root cause of CCD would be exceedingly more complicated than had originally been thought. All of this, of course, is before considering the toll that centuries of agricultural modernization had taken on the fragile&amp;mdash;but indispensable&amp;mdash;honey bee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;When the honey bee&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;first came to the New World in 1622 it was known by the Native Americans as the &amp;ldquo;white man&amp;rsquo;s fly.&amp;rdquo; Thomas Jefferson made note of this in 1781, writing that, &amp;ldquo;the bees have generally extended themselves into the country, a little in advance of the white settlers.&amp;rdquo; Indigenous people saw the bees as a harbinger of what we might now call modernization. And in many ways the bees&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;modern. After centuries of being bred in Europe, they had very much become a product of their human caretakers. Back then it was common practice that when it came time to collect honey, beekeepers would walk around their apiaries, lifting each hive off the ground, checking its weight. Bees in the heaviest hives were killed so that their honey could be harvested. The lightest&amp;mdash;poorest producing&amp;mdash;hives were merged in the hopes that together they could make more honey. According to Gene Kritsky, a College of Mount St. Joseph Entomologist and Editor-in-chief of&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;American Entomologist&lt;/i&gt;, an unforeseen consequence of this was that &amp;ldquo;going back centuries we had basically been selecting for a poorer bee.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the bee thrived in the New World as beekeeping spread throughout the colonies. The honey bees allowed colonists to plant crops like apples, a non-indigenous fruit largely helpless in North America without the non-indigenous honey bee to pollinate it. Colonists didn&amp;rsquo;t immediately recognize the importance of the honey bee as a pollinator for apple trees, but they had brought with them everything they needed to grow large patches of a single crop. It was, to say the least, an impressive accident.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The practice of sowing large tracts of land with only one crop variety, known as monoculture, increased steadily through the Industrial Revolution. When the 20th century rolled around, nitrogen fertilizers, mechanized farming equipment, railways, roads, and other innovations were enabling the cultivation of larger and larger monoculture crops. One natural limit to monoculture was imposed by the fact that at some point, if your crop was too large, you would be unable to find enough bees to pollinate it. But in 1908 a Utah beekeeper realized he could double his profits by shipping his hives by train to California during the winter months. With that, the migratory beekeeping industry was born. Farmers began paying beekeepers to haul their bees across the country every season, allowing them to plant as much as they liked, provided they could afford the added cost of hiring extra pollinators. California&amp;rsquo;s almond growers, for example, each spring enlist the services of half of all honey bee hives in the US. &amp;ldquo;They contract beekeepers to load up flatbed trucks with hundreds of beehives and place them on pallets in the middle of almond groves,&amp;rdquo; says Kritsky. &amp;ldquo;Then the bees might go to apples in Washington. And then maybe to Texas for cotton. Then it starts all over again.&amp;rdquo; The bees, quite simply, get strung out&amp;mdash;a problem only exacerbated since the 1940s, when pesticides came into widespread use and spurred a further increase of monoculture farming. &amp;ldquo;We are forcing the bees to do things that they never evolved to do,&amp;rdquo; says Kritsky.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While honey bees helped transform the ecology of modern farming, strong political, economic, and technological forces were also at work: Towards the end of WWII, the introduction of mechanized farming equipment like cotton harvesters drastically reduced the need for manual labor on southern plantations. Many workers headed for Chicago, seeking factory jobs created during the war. Half of all African Americans to move north during the first half of the 20th century did so in the 1940s. And by 1950, the largest population of Mississippians outside of Mississippi was in Chicago.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But as WWII ended and the cotton harvesters pushed even more workers north, soon the city ran out of jobs. So by the time Muddy Waters recorded &amp;ldquo;Honey Bee,&amp;rdquo; the buzzing of the bee, had in a few short centuries in the US, transformed from a foretoken of modernization&amp;mdash;a symbol of &amp;ldquo;progress&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash;to a song of those struggling under the weight of the modern world they helped develop.&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;The Chicago Bee&lt;/i&gt;, for example, was a newspaper promoting black artists, politicians, and workers in Chicago. In the 1950s, clubs in like&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;The Beehive Lounge&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;were a venue for the city&amp;rsquo;s jazz and the burgeoning electric blues scene. According to Horn, &amp;ldquo;when black musicians started singing about the honey bee, they were singing to an audience divorced from land, their family, and their heritage.&amp;rdquo; If not itself a modern blues song, the honey bee&amp;rsquo;s buzz had become, at the very least, a song of our modern blues. So Memphis Minnie sang: &amp;ldquo;I can&amp;rsquo;t stand to hear him buzz, buzz, buzz&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Last month&lt;/b&gt;, Alaux&amp;rsquo;s group in France published a study in &lt;i&gt;Biology Letters&lt;/i&gt; that suggests the extent to which our agricultural practices&amp;mdash;and monoculture in particular&amp;mdash;may have factored into the honey bee colony collapses of the past three years. &amp;ldquo;Bees are forced to go into huge fields and feed on only one type of pollen,&amp;rdquo; says Alaux. &amp;ldquo;Pollen is a major source of protein for them so we wanted to test the effects of this diet.&amp;rdquo; His group fed young bees pollen diets of varying diversity. Some were given many different types, while others only one. They found that, after 10 days, the bees that had eaten the less diverse diet of pollen ended up with weaker immune systems, making them less able to fight off pathogens and withstand the stresses of beekeeping. It wasn&amp;rsquo;t just pesticide-saturated pollen that was weakening the bees, it was the pollen itself&amp;mdash;or more specifically, a monotonous diet of one type of pollen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a team of researchers recently found at Pennsylvania State, honey bees are even further plagued by the agricultural history contained in their pollen. Nineteen classes of pesticides have been used in the recorded history of farming. Some, like DDT, have been banned for more than 25 years. It must have been a curious feeling, then, that overcame the researchers when they examined more than a thousand different samples of wax and pollen and found traces of every class of pesticide ever used&amp;mdash;including DDT. &amp;ldquo;It has caused concern world wide,&amp;rdquo; says Cox-Foster of the study&amp;rsquo;s findings, which are now being supported by other labs as well. &amp;ldquo;These pesticides are not going away.&amp;rdquo; This might not be all that bad if bees were feeding on the diverse pollen diet they had evolved to enjoy, as some bees would get the poison and some would not. But in today&amp;rsquo;s world of modern agriculture, if a particular crop is bad, every bee in the hive is going to taste it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, the exact role that mono-pollen diets and long-ago banned pesticides have played in the honey bee colony collapses of the past three years isn&amp;rsquo;t known. They are, after all, only a few details in the long and complicated story of bees and modern agriculture. Europeans spent centuries selecting for the poorest honey-producing bees; American beekeepers took these hives and began shipping them around the country, often multiple times a year, in order to propagate the growth of a farming industry that, as it grew, only put further stress on the bees that sustained it; farmers worldwide doused their crops with pesticides that weakened the bees&amp;rsquo; immune systems; and the bees were weakened even more by the very pollen diets the monoculture crops provided. So what we have to make sense of, then, against this history, is how the 18 known bee viruses, 19 different classes of pesticides, and countless stressors of modern beekeeping all fit together to make the honey bee fly off and&amp;mdash;in Muddy Waters&amp;rsquo; words&amp;mdash;keep on sailing &amp;lsquo;til it loses its happy home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Muddy Waters is said to have written &amp;ldquo;Honey Bee&amp;rdquo; while riding a tractor on the Stovall Plantation near Clarksdale, Mississippi&amp;mdash;and indeed, he may have penned the lyrics there. But the &amp;ldquo;Honey Bee&amp;rdquo; Waters had written in Mississippi is sometimes thought to have been a rewrite of the song &amp;ldquo;Bumble Bee&amp;rdquo; by the delta blues queen Memphis Minnie, which she recorded in New York in 1929. Waters may have learned the song from a record or he may have heard bluesmen like Son House playing it when they passed through Clarksdale. In any case, once Waters brought the song to Chicago it was not simply the electric guitar that shaped &amp;ldquo;Honey Bee,&amp;rdquo; it was the fact that his grandmother had died and given him an inheritance, enabling him to buy a car. This car made him an attractive addition to any Chicago band and in that way he began playing with Sonny Boy Williamson, a man who used to tour with Memphis Minnie and recorded his own &amp;ldquo;Honey Bee Blues&amp;rdquo; in 1938. No one story will ever be told about how Muddy Waters, now remembered as the &amp;ldquo;Father of Chicago Blues,&amp;rdquo; came to sing &amp;ldquo;Honey Bee&amp;rdquo; in 1951, because there is no one story to tell: To delve into the nature of a blues song is to concede a loss of narrative.&lt;/p&gt;
--&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/390920161</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/390920161</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:49:00 -0500</pubDate><category>article</category></item><item><title>Winds of Change</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/winds_of_change/"&gt;Seed magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THE STORIES WE TELL PROVIDE US WITH A RECORD OF OUR CONTINUING STRUGGLE TO UNDERSTAND THE PECULIAR EFFECTS WEATHER HAS ON OUR LIVES.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Hopi people&lt;/strong&gt; of the southwestern US have a story: During a long drought when corn wouldn’t grow, the tribe began running out of food. Two children made a toy hummingbird that, as they tossed it into the air, came to life. It flew to the center of the Earth and begged the god of fertility for help. And he made it rain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For as long as we have been telling stories, we have been telling them about weather, trying, in the absence of scientific certainty, to understand its influence on our lives. In the small body of research there has been on the topic, we’ve found that wind and heat can make us cranky, violent, sick, and suicidal. We honk more horns, have more headaches, kill more people and, according to a recent study, even fight more wars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Warming increases the risk of civil war in Africa,” reads the title of a paper published in &lt;em&gt;PNAS &lt;/em&gt;in November that looked at the relationship between temperature and armed conflict in the sub-Sahara. Researchers found that violence was more likely to erupt in years with hotter weather. “If the temperature goes up by just one degree, crop yields can decline by 20 percent or more,” explains Marshall Burke, one of the study’s authors. “Since 75 percent of poor Africans are engaged in agriculture for their livelihoods, these small changes can have big influence on their incentives to join rebellions.” It’s a frighteningly simple logic that suggests a frighteningly simpler one: The hotter Africa gets, the more violent a place it will become.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Hopi had a similar appreciation for the weather, though they made sense of it not through research but narrative. Stories like theirs give us a record of how humanity has coped with and tried to escape the influence of its environment. Many of these stories have been unknowingly shaped by the scientific thinking of their time, reflecting our bizarre and often specious attempts to put scientific explanation behind the still largely mysterious feeling we get that, when the weather changes, so do we. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/winds_of_change/"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!--
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hans Christian Andersen&amp;rsquo;s 1862 story&lt;/b&gt;, &amp;ldquo;The Ice Maiden,&amp;rdquo; describes the weather in an Alpine pass: &amp;ldquo;The wind blew from the south, an African wind; it suddenly sprang up over the high summits, like a foehn, which swept the clouds away.&amp;rdquo; The warm &amp;ldquo;foehn&amp;rdquo; wind Andersen refers to is notorious for causing bizarre human behavior. Suicides, domestic violence, depression, and nausea have all been attributed to the Swiss foehn, earning it a place in countless stories and superstitions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, as University of Wyoming anthropologist Sarah Strauss points out, had Andersen written this passage two decades later, his description of the wind would likely have been completely different. The scientific thinking in 1862 was that a wind as warm and dry as the foehn could come only from Africa&amp;mdash;that is, it could only be &amp;ldquo;an African wind.&amp;rdquo; But within 20 years it was largely understood that the foehn&amp;rsquo;s peculiar properties could be explained by the distinct way it develops. When air is forced quickly up the side of a mountain range, it cools and forms into a cloud. Near the peak of the mountain the cloud dumps its moisture as rain or snow, leaving a dry wind that heats up as it rushes down the opposite face. The temperature change it brings to the villages it blows through can be striking. The largest recorded change caused by a foehn-type wind was in the Black Hills of South Dakota in the winter of 1943 when, in the small town of Spearfish, thermometers rose 49 degrees in only 2 minutes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The German-Swiss author Herman Hesse pondered the foehn&amp;rsquo;s effects in his 1904 novel&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Peter Camenzind&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;about the life of a fictional Swiss man by the same name. Hesse was likely drawing from his own experiences when he wrote that Camenzind felt the foehn had invested his village in the Alps with a &amp;ldquo;penchant for melancholy.&amp;rdquo; Hesse had spent six years of his childhood living in Basel, Switzerland, a place Camenzind visits in the novel where effects of the foehn have long been reported. &amp;ldquo;For people who live in areas where foehn winds blow, there is an overwhelming amount of anecdotal evidence for these effects, but there has been only a small amount of scientific research to back them,&amp;rdquo; says Strauss.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Foehn effects are so well accepted today in Switzerland that publications for foreigners working in the country include warnings about them, cautioning that some, though not all, suffer from the &amp;ldquo;oppressive&amp;rdquo; winds. Swiss lore states that the foehn&amp;rsquo;s effects manifest variably, based on the sex and age of its victims. This experience is perhaps best left to Hesse&amp;rsquo;s Peter Camenzind for interpretation: &amp;ldquo;As a child I was afraid of the foehn, even hated it&amp;hellip;later my love of the foehn deepened&amp;hellip;nothing could be stranger or more delicious than the sweet foehn fever that overcomes the people in the mountain regions, especially the women, whom it robs of sleep, tantalizing their senses.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the 1950s and 60s, a team of Israeli scientists began experimenting scientifically with the foehn&amp;rsquo;s influence on different age groups in Jerusalem; it was thought at the time that half of the city&amp;rsquo;s population suffered from some sort of foehn-related sickness. The foehn they studied was not that of the Swiss Alps, but a Middle Eastern wind known as the khamsin. The khamsin is as notorious an arbiter of human behavior as the Swiss foehn. When it blows, automobile accidents increase, and crime rises as much as 20 percent. And like those in Switzerland, judges in some countries take a lenient attitude toward crimes committed during the khamsin&amp;mdash;a fact that conceivably only increased crime when&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Time&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;magazine later reported it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Israeli team claimed that the khamsin increases the production of the hormone serotonin, causing young people to develop migraines and to become nauseated and violent. Older people, they said, have a different reaction, becoming fatigued, apathetic, and depressed as their production of adrenaline decreases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The team&amp;rsquo;s explanation for the findings was the controversial idea of &amp;ldquo;air ion concentration.&amp;rdquo; Ions are atoms or molecules that have either lost or gained electrons, resulting in a net positive or negative charge, respectively. The unusually high concentration of positive air ions in certain weather fronts like the foehn or the khamsin was first reported in 1901. A study in 1963 had also claimed that 30 percent of the population exposed to the khasmin began to feel the negative effects of the winds as soon as the concentration of positive air ions increased&amp;mdash;24 to 48 hours before the winds perceptibly started to blow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the Israeli researchers, all this added up to a simple chain of meteorological and physiological effects: When the wind blows, it accumulates positive ions. This causes a rise in serotonin production, which in turn leads to nausea, vomiting, migraines, and a number of potential other side effects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers&amp;rsquo; proposed treatment for these effects was a machine known as the &amp;ldquo;ionotron&amp;rdquo; that generated large numbers of negative ions. As far back as the 1930s German doctors had attempted to treat bronchitis and asthma by having patients inhale negative ions. It was later found however, that in many of these cases the generators weren&amp;rsquo;t powerful enough to produce ions at all. In the US, ion generators were sold as a treatment to all sorts of diseases until the FDA banned them from being marketed for as a cure for medical illness. Today, ion generators are touted as a treatment for Seasonal Affective Disorder, a depression observed in some individuals who live in areas with long dark winters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is some evidence that ions can have an effect on us, but scientists are far from settled on the issue of what role, if any, atmospheric ions play in weather-related illnesses. The late physicist Niels Jonassen commented in 2002, &amp;ldquo;I have never been able to find any hint of a trustworthy theory explaining how a unipolar ionization of the air mass could take place, let alone explain how the charge could be carried hundreds of miles over the mountains without dissipating. I have also not seen any proper scientific papers demonstrating the excess of positive ions in these winds.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;True or not, the ion explanation has changed the way we talk about weather. In her 1968 essay &amp;ldquo;Los Angeles Notebook,&amp;rdquo; which reflects on living in a city with another notorious foehn wind, the Santa Ana, the essayist Joan Didion popularized a deterministic interpretation of the foehn&amp;rsquo;s power over us. &amp;ldquo;To live with the Santa Ana is to accept, consciously or unconsciously, a deeply mechanistic view of human behavior,&amp;rdquo; she writes, &amp;ldquo;&amp;hellip;positive ions are there, and what an excess of positive ions does, in the simplest terms, is make people unhappy. One cannot get much more mechanistic than that.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Many of the scientists&lt;/b&gt; studying the effects of weather on human behavior&amp;mdash;not just as a result of foehn winds&amp;mdash;don&amp;rsquo;t agree with the deterministic view of the weather&amp;rsquo;s impact on us. &amp;ldquo;People very often use that word &amp;lsquo;mechanistic&amp;rsquo; when talking about the effects heat has on violence,&amp;rdquo; says Craig A. Anderson, a psychologist at Iowa State University who has been studying the link between temperature and human behavior for the past 30 years. &amp;ldquo;Usually that is a sign that they haven&amp;rsquo;t actually read any of the papers we&amp;rsquo;ve written.&amp;rdquo; He began studying what is now called the heat hypothesis&amp;mdash;which states that as the temperature increases, so does the likelihood of aggression&amp;mdash;as a graduate student in 1979, when he looked at the relationship between heat waves and rioting in the United States. Since that time there has been a slew of studies finding that when the temperature goes up, so does the likelihood of violence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the surface, it seems that the dismal mechanistic view might be appropriate: The second half of the 1960s saw an explosion of race riots across the United States. On August 11 1965, a riot erupted in the Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles. Six days later 34 people were dead and more than a thousand injured. In Detroit during the hot summer of 1967, a riot erupted after a raid at an after-hours drinking club. After five days and an intervention from the US Army, 43 people had been killed, and more than a thousand injured. Over a hundred major riots occurred in cities such as Washington DC and Newark during what are now known as the &amp;ldquo;long, hot summers.&amp;rdquo; Last year the&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;published a homicide map charting when and where each reported murder since 2003 in the five boroughs occurred. It&amp;rsquo;s easy to see from the map that during the summer months, killing increases. But to say that heat&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;caused&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;the race riots or homicides in New York misinterprets what is going on. &amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;re talking about dynamic systems at a physiological, social, and political level. There is nothing mechanistic about them,&amp;rdquo; Anderson says.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both Anderson and Burke are now working on using their research to predict and address problems that may result from climate change. For Burke, his findings about the relationship between heat and war in Africa take on a particular urgency when considered in light of near-future temperature changes predicted by climate models. &amp;ldquo;We find these large possible increases by 2030,&amp;rdquo; he says. &amp;ldquo;To us, that points to the importance of helping prevent violence by making investments to help agriculture adapt to higher temperatures.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The objective of this research is not to uncover a frighteningly mechanical connection between the environment and us, but to understand and better respond to the effects weather has on our lives. Ancient Egyptians danced to make it rain. The Romans had a stone they would drag to the senate floor and douse with water as they made sacrifices during times of drought. More recently, people sucked negative air ions from generators to attempt to mitigate a myriad of effects from weather. Now, we have the ability to supply farmers with more heat-tolerant crops and to offer global aid to African countries in times of drought. We can install air conditioners in schools, prisons, and other institutions that are prone to violence. In short, our rain dances are getting better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, work on Anderson&amp;rsquo;s heat hypothesis seems to suggest a practical usefulness for the stories we&amp;rsquo;ve been telling all along about weather. There is evidence that if people are aware that they are irritable because it is hot, they are better able to suppress violent responses that lead to assault and murder. By preserving information about the weather&amp;rsquo;s ability to impact us, these stories may serve to limit its more insidious effects. When we consider our relationship to the environment, perhaps we should internalize another thought from Didion, the opening sentence to&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;The White Album,&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;her 1979 essay coping with a country stricken with paranoia: &amp;ldquo;We tell ourselves stories in order to live.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
--&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/318535763</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/318535763</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><category>article</category></item><item><title>Into the Uncanny Valley</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/uncanny_valley/"&gt;Seed magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NEW FINDINGS SHED LIGHT ON A CENTURY’S WORTH OF BIZARRE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE EERIE FEELING WE GET AROUND LIFELIKE ROBOTS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A dead body&lt;/strong&gt; appears in almost every way to be a normal human. But the pallid skin and empty eyes signal that the person-shaped form we are looking at is, in a way we can’t even fully grasp, strange and disturbing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We feel a similar eeriness when interacting with robots and models that look &lt;em&gt;almost &lt;/em&gt;human but fall short of convincing us because of subtle peculiarities in their features. Poor box office returns on computer-animated films like “The Polar Express” and “Beowulf” were blamed on moviegoers finding the not quite true-to-life characters unsettling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disturbing experiences that feel both familiar and strange are instances of the “uncanny,” an intuitive concept, yet one that has defied simple explanation for more than a century. Interest in the particular occurrences of the uncanny, in which humans are bothered by interaction with human-like models, began as a psychological curiosity. But as our ability to design artificial life has increased—along with our dependence on it—getting to the heart of why people respond negatively to realistic models of themselves has taken on a new importance. Attempts to understand the origins of this reaction, known since the 1970s as the “uncanny valley response,” have drawn on everything from repressed fears of castration to an evolutionary mechanism for mate selection, but there has been little empirical evidence to assess the validity of these ideas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New findings published in &lt;em&gt;PNAS &lt;/em&gt;this September are putting some long-overdue experimental rigor behind the uncanny valley. Last spring at Princeton’s Neuroscience Institute, Asif Ghazanfar developed a computer model of a macaque monkey designed to interact with real macaques. But the monkeys weren’t fooled. Further testing revealed that, much to Ghazanfar’s surprise, his model was eliciting an uncanny valley response from the monkeys. It was the first time scientists had ever observed such a response in a non-human species.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“By showing that monkeys can do it, several things become plausible,” Ghazanfar says. “One is that there is an evolutionary explanation for the uncanny valley and the other is that it is not something specific to our human, cultural experience.” These findings may for the first time allow scientists to go back through a century’s worth of peculiar ideas about the origins of the uncanny valley and begin putting them to the test.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/uncanny_valley/"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!--
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sigmund Freud offered&lt;/b&gt; the first major attempt to explain our uncanny response toward life-like human models. With World War I still dragging on across Europe in 1918, Freud was having trouble finding article submissions for his psychoanalytic journal,&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Imago&lt;/i&gt;, and so decided to contribute something himself. The following year, he published a bizarre 40-page essay on an almost completely unknown concept in psychology. Freud&amp;rsquo;s subject was the &amp;ldquo;uncanny,&amp;rdquo; a term coined 13 years earlier by a little-known German doctor named Ernst Jentsch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Titled &amp;ldquo;The Uncanny,&amp;rdquo; Freud&amp;rsquo;s essay is, in nearly every aspect, as strange as the phenomenon it struggles to understand. &amp;ldquo;There is a lot of contradictory information in there,&amp;rdquo; says Samuel Weber, a professor of philosophy and literature at the European Graduate School. &amp;ldquo;If you put it together you realize it doesn&amp;rsquo;t add up neatly to any unified position.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For instance, Freud begins with a disclaimer that he hasn&amp;rsquo;t had an uncanny personal experience in so long that he must &amp;ldquo;awaken in [himself] the possibility of experiencing it,&amp;rdquo; implying that he either he wrote some 12,000 words about a psychological phenomenon he has no personal understanding of or he isn&amp;rsquo;t fully aware of his own familiarity with his subject. Weber sides with the latter interpretation. &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s not a question of whether what he is doing is invalid, but whether there is more going on there than he wants to&amp;mdash;or is able to&amp;mdash;acknowledge,&amp;rdquo; he says.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Indeed, Freud&amp;rsquo;s personal life often creeps into his examples of the uncanny. Such is the case as he explains that when he encounters a number&amp;mdash;36 or 855, for instance&amp;mdash;several times in the same day, he is overcome with an uncanny feeling. This is arguably one of the most universally shared uncanny experiences not involving an interaction with a human model. We are all intimately familiar with numbers, so when we encounter them in a strange context, we respond with a feeling of unease and suspicion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is telling about Freud&amp;rsquo;s use of this example is the number he chose to make his point: 62. According to his official biographer, Ernest Jones, Freud had written much of &amp;ldquo;The Uncanny&amp;rdquo; years before its publication but waited until he passed the age of 62 to complete it. Not coincidentally, Freud&amp;rsquo;s father was 62 when he died. Even while Freud denies any familiarity with the uncanny, he readily plucks examples from his personal life in order to illustrate it. The experience of writing &amp;ldquo;The Uncanny&amp;rdquo; must have been, for Freud, a rather uncanny one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to Freud, the phenomenon that would later be called the uncanny valley stems from a primitive attempt of humans to skirt death and secure our own immortality by creating copies of ourselves&amp;mdash;such as wax figures and, later, life-like robots. He quotes his colleague Otto Rank in saying that this &amp;ldquo;doubling&amp;rdquo; behavior is &amp;ldquo;an energetic denial of the power of death&amp;rdquo; and suggests the idea of the immortal soul was the first double of the body. Our uncanny response follows from the fact that most of us no longer believe we can secure our own immortality by making copies of ourselves, but we haven&amp;rsquo;t yet shaken the primitive habit of trying to do so. The sad consequence of this is that, in Freud&amp;rsquo;s words, &amp;ldquo;The double reverses its aspect. From having been an assurance of immortality, it becomes the uncanny harbinger of death.&amp;rdquo; The copies we feel compelled to make only serve to remind us why we began making them in the first place: We are, inevitably, going to die.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;For Ghazanfar&lt;/b&gt;, Freud&amp;rsquo;s explanation of the uncanny valley, steeped in psychoanalytic theory, is much too &amp;ldquo;human-specific.&amp;rdquo; Nevertheless, the connection Freud makes between death and the uncanny valley persists in one form or another to this day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the most part, Freud&amp;rsquo;s essay reads like one big Freudian slip, revealing its author&amp;rsquo;s own anxieties about reconciling the uncanny with psychoanalysis. But in a sense, it succeeds despite itself: Its failures serve to illustrate the difficult nature of the uncanny, which is arguably the reason that for decades few scholars made serious attempts to investigate its origins: &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s hard to treat the uncanny in the regular objectifying manner of the sciences or the humanities because it manifests itself through an interaction of subject and object&amp;mdash;of feeling and situation&amp;mdash;and in a way that is the hardest thing to analyze,&amp;rdquo; Weber explains.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 1970 the Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori published a short paper in the journal&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Energy&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;in which he tried his hand at explaining the uncanny response we have toward human models. In much the same way Ghazanfar would later observe the uncanny valley response in monkeys, Mori noticed that when robots look very similar to us&amp;mdash;but not so similar that we consciously mistake them for humans&amp;mdash;our comfort level around them drops considerably. He dubbed this drop,&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;bukimi no tani&lt;/i&gt;, or the &amp;ldquo;uncanny valley.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In his paper, also titled &amp;ldquo;The Uncanny Valley,&amp;rdquo; he recommends that roboticists avoid building robots so realistic that they risk falling into the valley, offering the example of hands on a Buddha statue as an alternative approach to robot design: &amp;ldquo;The hand has no finger print, and it assumes the natural color of wood,&amp;rdquo; he wrote. &amp;ldquo;But we feel it is beautiful and there is no sense of the uncanny.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the West, there is often a Frankensteinian stigma attached to artificial intelligence, but Mori offered Japan a much different perspective. In&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;The Buddha in the Robot: A Robot Engineer&amp;rsquo;s Thoughts on Science and Religion,&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;published in 1974, he wrote, &amp;ldquo;I believe robots have the Buddha-nature within them&amp;mdash;that is, the potential for attaining Buddhahood.&amp;rdquo; His ideas about religion and the uncanny valley have had a substantial influence on the development of Japanese robotics. &amp;ldquo;In Japan, there is a great sensitivity in the government for having people who are accepting of robotics and robots in general. Mori&amp;rsquo;s interpretation of the uncanny valley became a kind of dogma,&amp;rdquo; says Karl MacDorman, a roboticist at Indiana University. As a result, Japan spent the next few decades avoiding human-like robot designs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the purpose of Mori&amp;rsquo;s paper was to inform robot design, in a concluding paragraph he cannot resist offering his own theory about the origins of the uncanny valley. He writes: &amp;ldquo;When we die, we fall into the trough of the uncanny valley. Our body becomes cold, our color changes, and movement ceases.&amp;rdquo; Human models fall into the uncanny valley because they remind us of death. &amp;ldquo;It may be important to our self-preservation,&amp;rdquo; he concludes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mori, like Freud, linked the uncanny valley to a &amp;ldquo;human-specific&amp;rdquo; notion of death, and many have suggested that he had Freud in mind when he penned &amp;ldquo;The Uncanny Valley&amp;rdquo;&amp;mdash;which is possible since Freud&amp;rsquo;s concept of the uncanny,&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;unheimlich&lt;/i&gt;, was translated in Japanese as&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;bukimi&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;prior to the publication of Mori&amp;rsquo;s paper. But MacDorman, who co-authored the definitive English translation of &amp;ldquo;The Uncanny Valley,&amp;rdquo; has his doubts: &amp;ldquo;There is nothing wrong with connecting Mori&amp;rsquo;s ideas to Freud,&amp;rdquo; he says. &amp;ldquo;But I don&amp;rsquo;t think Mori was inspired by him.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2005 Mori began to get entangled with his study of the uncanny in much the same way that Freud had. In a somewhat puzzling note he sent to robotics conference, Mori wrote, &amp;ldquo;A dead person&amp;rsquo;s face may indeed be uncanny&amp;hellip;[but] dead persons are free from the troubles of life, and I think this is the reason why their faces look so calm and peaceful.&amp;rdquo; These words came 35 years after the original publication of &amp;ldquo;The Uncanny Valley&amp;rdquo; and appear to suggest that what one finds uncanny evolves over time. MacDorman speculates that, in Mori&amp;rsquo;s case, this might be attributed to his age or development as a Buddhist. Here Weber&amp;rsquo;s point again rings true: Understanding the uncanny is neither an entirely subjective nor objective endeavor. Study it long enough, and eventually it makes a study out of you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;But all along Mori&lt;/b&gt; hasn&amp;rsquo;t seen our avoidance of death as a consequence of repressed emotions the way Freud did. Instead he has understood it to be a mechanism we developed to keep ourselves safe. Nearly every hypothesis since has had this flavor. It has been suggested, for instance, that we avoid&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;almost&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;human figures because their peculiarities make them look sick, and we have developed an evolutionary mechanism for steering clear of pathogens. Another theory posits that we avoid figures with features slightly off from our own because they appear to be less-than-ideal mating material.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ghazanfar rejects all of these hypotheses. &amp;ldquo;What is really going on is much simpler,&amp;rdquo; he says. He believes the uncanny valley response occurs because an animal&amp;mdash;human or nonhuman&amp;mdash;is evolutionarily inclined to develop an expectation of what members of its species should look like, a supremely important skill, as it lets the animal know with whom it can and cannot interact.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this sense, life-like robotic and computer-generated models occupy a weird middle ground in an animal&amp;rsquo;s mind: They are familiar enough for the animal to consider the possibility that they are of the same species, but strange enough that they don&amp;rsquo;t quite meet the expectation the animal has developed for members of its species. &amp;ldquo;Any face that violates that expectation is going to elicit the uncanny response,&amp;rdquo; Ghazanfar says.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There does appear to be some experimental evidence in support Ghazanfar&amp;rsquo;s theory. Studies with children have shown that at a very young age, babies do not react negatively to human-like robots. As children grow older, such robots become more bothersome. This, Ghazanfar suggests, might be an indicator that infants have not yet developed a narrow expectation for what a human should like. As of yet, however, he has not tested his theory explicitly. &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s what I think, but the experiments with monkeys weren&amp;rsquo;t straightforward so I couldn&amp;rsquo;t address all those things,&amp;rdquo; he says, which puts him in much the same place as Freud, Mori, and others before him.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even if Ghazanfar can prove that his theory is correct, it won&amp;rsquo;t necessarily disprove Freud or Mori. We just don&amp;rsquo;t know enough about the uncanny valley to be confident that it can be traced back to a single cause. And that&amp;rsquo;s always been one of the biggest difficulties studying the phenomenon: It&amp;rsquo;s easy to come up with new explanations, but hard to throw out the older ones. &amp;ldquo;Things can be uncanny because of perceptual mechanisms or more psychological mechanisms,&amp;rdquo; MacDorman says. &amp;ldquo;So I don&amp;rsquo;t think the uncanny valley is necessarily a kind of single phenomenon.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The uncanny valley has shaped robotics design for the past 40 years in Japan. Computer generated characters in videogames and films are designed to avoid it. Yet a clear understanding of it&amp;mdash;or even an agreed-upon definition&amp;mdash;still escapes us. Ghazanfar hopes his research will help to address these questions someday soon, but for the time being we know little more for certain about its origins than we did when Ernst Jentsch first called our attention to it in 1906. Perhaps we should have heeded the German doctor&amp;rsquo;s cautionary clause as he began to broach the subject: &amp;ldquo;[If] one wants to come closer to the essence of the uncanny, it is better not to ask what it is&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
--&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/318534845</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/318534845</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><category>article</category></item><item><title>The Wagnerian Method</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/the_wagnerian_method/"&gt;Seed magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PHYSICISTS INVESTIGATE THE GRAND ARTISTIC VISION OF ONE OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL ARTISTS OF THE LAST TWO CENTURIES.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When physicist John Smith spent the night in his garden with the score to &lt;em&gt;Götterdämmerung&lt;/em&gt;, the final opera in Richard Wagner’s four-part, 15-hour epic, &lt;em&gt;Der Ring des Nibelungen&lt;/em&gt;, he wasn’t interested in its account of the apocalyptic struggle of Norse gods for control of the world. Smith was concerned with a struggle of a different sort—one between the opera’s words and music that might elucidate the controversial German composer’s peculiar vision for the future of art.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Smith’s mind was an age-old difficulty all soprano singers face: They mispronounce lyrics when singing powerfully in the top half of their range. This “soprano problem” was formally recognized at least as far back as 1843, when French composer Hector Berlioz wrote in his &lt;em&gt;Treatise on Instrumentation&lt;/em&gt; that “[sopranos] should not be required to sing many words on high phrases, since this makes the pronunciation of syllables very difficult if not impossible.” It does not appear, however, that Berlioz—or anyone else—ever understood why this problem occurred.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2004, Smith and his colleagues Joe Wolfe and Elodie Joliveau at the University of New South Wales published a study in the&lt;em&gt;Journal of the Acoustical Society of America&lt;/em&gt; that revealed the physiological cause of the soprano problem for the first time. They sent an acoustic signal through the vocal tracts of nine sopranos and used a microphone to measure how the signal changed when the sopranos sang vowel sounds at various pitches. They found that when a soprano sings at high pitches, she adjusts her vocal tract to make her voice resonate. In effect, she “tunes” the resonance frequency of her vocal tract to match the frequency of the pitch at which she is singing. This vocal-tract tuning, which gives a soprano’s voice enough power to fill an opera house, is what makes certain words at high pitches difficult for the audience to understand. (It is joked by singers that Wagner’s character of Siegfried in &lt;em&gt;Der Ring des Nibelungen&lt;/em&gt; ought to have been called S&lt;em&gt;ah&lt;/em&gt;gfried, as his name is sometimes pronounced that way by sopranos looking to get the most volume out of their voices.) Jane Eaglen, a critically acclaimed soprano who has performed Wagner’s works in opera houses worldwide, explains that sopranos must try to find a balance between power and clarity. “It’s really about how you modify the vowels at the top of the voice so that the words are still understandable but so that you are also making the best sound that you can make,” she says.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/the_wagnerian_method/"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!--
&lt;p&gt;Composers generally cope with this problem by writing lyrics for sopranos that are not essential to their operas&amp;rsquo; plots. But Smith and Wolfe began to wonder whether some hadn&amp;rsquo;t found a better solution. They realized that composers could actually avoid the problem completely by pairing words with notes at which the vowel sounds resonated naturally in a singer&amp;rsquo;s mouth. Smith saw Wagner&amp;mdash;a perfectionist notorious for writing long and demanding soprano roles&amp;mdash;as an obvious candidate on which he and Wolfe could test their theory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wagner was a ruthless opportunist and an outspoken anti-Semite with an ego on par with the grandiosity of his operas. His narcissism and stubbornness plagued his personal life, but shaped him into an idealistic and dedicated artist who was utterly uncompromising in his work. It took him almost 30 years to complete his&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Der Ring des Nibelungen&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;cycle. He was methodical in his research, engrossing himself in Hellenic dramas and Norse mythology. He worked and reworked each opera without regard for the growing horde of creditors that was never far behind him. When need be, he even created new instruments and edifices&amp;mdash;he invented the Wagner tuba, and, in the 1870s, built his own opera house, the Bayreuth Festspielhaus, just to get the sounds he wanted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Smith felt that through this obsession with perfection, Wagner might have come to understand the relationship between vowel sounds and pitch necessary to overcome the soprano problem. &amp;ldquo;He was a man of huge experience who had a lot of time to polish his operas,&amp;rdquo; Smith explains. &amp;ldquo;Others had to do it for a living, but Wagner sponged off other people.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps most importantly, Smith&amp;rsquo;s decision to focus on Wagner was also influenced by the sheer scope and demand of Wagner&amp;rsquo;s ultimate vision: to synthesize all forms of artistic expression into what he called &amp;ldquo;total artwork.&amp;rdquo; He wrote passionately about this theory in his 150-page essay,&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;The Art-Work of the Future&lt;/i&gt;, referring to dance, tone, and poetry as the &amp;ldquo;three primeval sisters&amp;rdquo; without which no work of art is complete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Wagner always said that he wanted to be Shakespeare and Beethoven in one. He wanted to write great plays and set those plays to great music,&amp;rdquo; says Michael Saffle, a musicologist at Virginia Tech. In pursuit of &amp;ldquo;total artwork,&amp;rdquo; Wagner allowed no artistic component of his operas to take precedence over any other; the plot was as important as the score and the design of the set as important as the poetry of the libretto. (He considered his librettos literature in their own right, even going so far as to publish them as independent works.) His operas contained subtle plot twists that required his audience to pay careful attention to the lyrics being sung. Wagner couldn&amp;rsquo;t&amp;mdash;and wouldn&amp;rsquo;t&amp;mdash;compromise the intelligibility of his lyrics during high soprano parts. &amp;ldquo;You weren&amp;rsquo;t supposed to go just to tap your toe to the tunes,&amp;rdquo; Saffle says. &amp;ldquo;He didn&amp;rsquo;t want that. He wanted you to take in everything, and everything had to play a crucial part.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So one evening in his garden while he was recovering from surgery, Smith took up a pen and paper and went through&lt;i&gt;G&amp;ouml;tterd&amp;auml;mmerung&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;note-by-note, lyric-by-lyric, recording which notes were paired with which vowel sounds. In the early hours of the next morning he wrote a computer program to determine with statistical certainty whether Wagner had in fact used a vowel-pitch matching technique. Looking at the program&amp;rsquo;s first results, he was amazed. There was a clear relationship.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After Smith&amp;rsquo;s discovery, he and Wolfe began analyzing more of Wagner&amp;rsquo;s work. &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s quite a tedious job, but sitting in the garden reading Wagner is not a bad way to spend your time,&amp;rdquo; Smith says. In all, Smith and Wolfe looked at four of the composer&amp;rsquo;s works, including&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Tristan und Isolde&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;and three operas from Wagner&amp;rsquo;s magnum opus,&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Der Ring des Nibelungen&lt;/i&gt;. In each case they found a statistically significant correlation between the music and lyrics. For comparison they also looked at operas by Mozart, Rossini, and Strauss and determined that, in these compositions, no such correlation existed. This didn&amp;rsquo;t surprise Eaglen. &amp;ldquo;Some composers had a better idea of how voices worked than others. For example, Beethoven did not really understand how the voice works. But Wagner clearly did,&amp;rdquo; she says. Smith and Wolfe first published their findings in the&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Journal of the Acoustical Society of America&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;this July, and since then they have continued to test the works of more modern composers. &amp;ldquo;Wagner&amp;rsquo;s operas have certainly the strongest effect we have seen by a long way,&amp;rdquo; Smith says.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers found that as Wagner&amp;rsquo;s career progressed he continued to improve his vowel-pitch matching technique, suggesting that over time he had developed an intuitive sense of the interplay between words and music in his operas. Though he couldn&amp;rsquo;t express this concept in scientific terms, on some level he certainly grasped it. Eaglen&amp;rsquo;s experience performing the character of Br&amp;uuml;nnhilde throughout the&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Der Ring des Nibelungen&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;cycle also corroborates what Smith and Wolfe discovered. &amp;ldquo;The progression of that character is just fascinating. What Wagner writes for her at the end of&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;G&amp;ouml;tterd&amp;auml;mmerung&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;isn&amp;rsquo;t the same music that he could have written in&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Die Walk&amp;uuml;re&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[the second opera in the cycle, written 18 years before&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;G&amp;ouml;tterd&amp;auml;mmerung&lt;/i&gt;]. His music develops along with her character,&amp;rdquo; she says.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The impact of Wagner&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;total artwork&amp;rdquo; is hard to pin down exactly, but the man himself is without question one of the most influential artists of the last 200 years. &amp;ldquo;Wagner influenced&amp;mdash;positively or negatively&amp;mdash;almost every subsequent musician,&amp;rdquo; Saffle says.&amp;nbsp; Some say composers like Richard Strauss and John Williams (the latter of whom is perhaps most well known for scoring films like&lt;i&gt;Star Wars&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Jurassic Park&lt;/i&gt;) both bear the mark of Wagner. And according to Saffle, you can find him outside of music as well. He is often considered to have anticipated film with his operas. &amp;ldquo;Terry Gilliam&amp;rsquo;s&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;is a Wagnerian movie,&amp;rdquo; he says. &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s all-encompassing, like Wagner&amp;rsquo;s total artwork. It takes the individual and hurls him up into the air or throws him down into the ground. That sense of emotional space, that is Wagner.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just as Jackson Pollock incorporated fractals into his splatter paintings, Wagner seems to have used vowel-pitch matching in his operas&amp;mdash;a concept that scientists wouldn&amp;rsquo;t formally explain for well over a century. And though it would certainly be going too far to suggest that vowel-pitch matching alone was responsible for Wagner&amp;rsquo;s grand compositions, without a strong intuitive sense of the human voice and its limitations, it is unlikely that he would have been able to take his unified theory of art so far. If understanding of concepts like vowel-pitch matching can emerge from the vastly different frameworks of art and science, then surely there is merit to considering Wagner&amp;rsquo;s thoughts on the eventual intersection of the two fields: In&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;The Art-Work of the Future&lt;/i&gt;, he writes, &amp;ldquo;The end of Science is the justifying of the Unconscious, the giving of self-consciousness to Life&amp;hellip;. As Science melts away into the recognition of the ultimate and self-determinate reality, of actual Life itself: so does this avowal win its frankest, most direct expression in Art.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
--&gt;</description><link>http://joekloc.com/post/318529978</link><guid>http://joekloc.com/post/318529978</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>article</category></item></channel></rss>

